Farewell old salt

Today's newsflash: David Bullard fired by Sunday Times!
Did anyone see his column last week, which was said to be racist and 'sparked' the 'furore'?

Comments

This from IOL/The Star...

Bullard said on Friday:

"He (the editor) did bring up my column and I asked why, if he thought it was racist, had he let it through.

"He said that he hadn't actually seen it before the time but it must have gone through four or five other people, so I believe this is all a result of pressure from above and political sources."

A collection of his Out to Lunch columns has been published in a book called Screw It, Let's Do Lunch.

He said he had handed over a cheque for R19 000, equal to 50 percent of the proceeds of the book, to the editor's choice of charities on Thursday.

"Ironically, I think that money is going to a shelter for black children," Bullard said..."

Fuck!

No that I have a horrible fondness for Bullard or anything like that. He is quite the opinionated sod, but we have so few columnists who dare say anything in the country. And everything is so horribly politically correct. Look the column was horribly patronising and not particularly funny or clever. But to fire the oke for having an opinion. That's a bit lame, particularly when you've published his article.

Finks

did you see the Special Assignment doccie on freedom of speech "at work"...very interesting...apparently, if you say things that damage your company's rep, you can get fired. Even if it is an infringement of your right to free speech. So journos are stuck. They can't "report" on the way their companies are run without getting fired. I suspect this is the loophole that nailed Bullard.

The doccie went into the stuff going on at hospitals, govt bodies, municipalities. Hectic.

Dolce

I never saw that. But the implications are frightening. Particularly given the ANC and Zuma's stance on the media. I think it is bullshit. Fear mongering. That's all it is.

Yeah, but fear shuts people up

and it's working.

The programme was about all the people who are now too scared of losing their jobs to speak out about abuse, corruption, negligence etc.

It is exceptionally frightening.

Well Dolce

People are not calling this country the US of Africa for nothing.

Pike

Bullard will be sorely missed. He always called things the way he saw them and took little notice of towing the PC line, whatever the topic. We could do with more Bullards, not less.

TL

I agree. His column has always been controversial... and only now does it become a problem? Something really does not smell very nice in the land of the Sunday Times.

We need to lighten up as a nation. Not everyone is racist and out to get you. Ive seen/heard enough shit in the media that poke fun at the Indians. I dont run to the ASA every time that happens. Take things in the spirit in which it was intended.

Not me, Semi

I always try to curry favour with the Indians.

Dex

So whats your flavour today?

Semi

the hotter the better, you know!

Yeah Dex

I know what you saying....

..... *turns on the fan*

TL

I don't agree with what he said in the article, which you can read here. But I also don't like the tone of Jon Qwelane's articles either and no-one is crying racism there.

Like Semi, I wonder why no-one at the Sunday Times said anything before it was published. Surely David Bullard's work is checked or read through before it is layed out on the newspaper?

Zeph

Just went to the link and while I didn't think it was one of his best columns in terms of writing and content, I interpreted the piece as VERY largely tongue in cheek.

Thank you Zeph

Why is no one crying foul over Jon Q? He is still very gainfully employed. Do different rules apply where one journalist can be raked over the coals for being 'racist' and another not? Shouldnt the playing fields be the same to equate the game?

To be fair Semi,

JQ works for another media house. They obviously don't mind

Clearly they dont Zeph

but racism is racism

I bet you

a nice fat advertising account was threatened to be pulled. And the Times got poeperig.

Pike

Yep did see it. But here's a question for you... why was it allowed to be published if they were going to turn around and fire him? There is more to that story than meets the eye methinks.

exacary. Either he has

exacary.

Either he has somewhere to go and thought f*ck it, go out with a bang - or they thought, let's give this whitie enough rope to lynch himself.
Who knows??
Strange days indeed.

Semi/Pike

I heard a snippet on the radio.

Apparently his boss interviewed him and was very disturbed to find out that Bullard actually believed that what he wrote was true.

Um?

Dusty

Have you read the article? I just dont think it was intended in the spirit that everyone is making it out to be.

Here's a response from him on news24.com.....

Johannesburg - Columnist David Bullard on Friday morning claimed the Sunday Times's controversial decision to fire him was a political one that had "absolutely nothing" to do with alleged racism in his latest column.

In an interview with News24, Bullard said a combination of his "annoying tendencies" to point out deficiencies in the paper as well as take politicians to task made him an easy target.

"Once you yell the word 'racist' it's like yelling the word 'communist' used to be in the McCarthy years," he said. "If I say: no I'm not a racist, it will sound as though I'm denying it. If I say: yes I am a racist, then obviously that's just as bad."

Sunday Times editor, Mondli Makhanya, said on Thursday that Bullard had been fired from his post and his weekly column was cancelled after an allegedly racist column was published.

Africa without the 'white man'

The column, titled "Uncolonised Africa wouldn't know what it was missing", described what South Africa would have looked like had the "evil white man" not come "to disturb the rustic idyll of the early black settlers", according to a Beeld report.

Bullard heard the news at about 17:20 on Thursday night while MCing at a function in Sandton. "I got a call from Mondli Makhanya who said: 'I think your article last Sunday was racist' - but he'd already told me that, and I said: well why'd you let it in the paper?"

The Sunday Times wasn't available for comment immediately on Friday morning.

Bullard believes that an article he wrote for Empire magazine in February criticising the paper may have more to do with the decision.

In the article, Bullard detailed his woes with the Sunday Times policy towards motor journalism and advertising.

"I think he (Makhanya) got very bitter when I suggested that sections of the newspaper weren't as good as they used to be or could have been," said Bullard.

"You're not allowed to have an opinion at Avusa [the Sunday Times holding company] it seems if you're on the staff."

Bullard maintained that accusations of racism were a red herring. "Mondli Makhanya thinks that I am a racist. Most of the other people I work with think that's an absurd opinion. I don't even think that's relevant to the article at all."

For Bullard the decision to axe his column was a surprising one, given that his brief was to be controversial.

'Show biz' column

"My column has been 'racist' and 'sexist', for years and the Sunday Times has loved it because it has actually brought in a lot of readers," he pointed out, adding that his column was more "show biz" than an academic treatise.

"They've said right go for it, be a wacko, be a shock jock. That's precisely what the brief was - [they were] hoping to sell the newspaper based on my incendiary articles.

"I said on the John Robbie show, if you wanted me to write about fly- fishing you should have told me."

While Makhanya was not available to respond he has called the column "extremely racist" and "not in accordance with the character and values of the Sunday Times".

"It's not about censorship, but about the fact that the column was not in accordance with the values to which our country and its constitution adhere," said Makhanya.

Once again, why was the article not pulled before it went to press if his editors thought it was racist? Why put him out to hang?

The Bullard situation has some interesting parallels with Kriel.

Liewellyn Kriel was fired by Sowetan for blogging about a breakdown of morale in the newsroom over shocking english usage by reporters and trash copy submitted to subs.

Avusa (formerly Johncom) is the parent of Sunday Times as well as Sowetan. "In an interview with News24, Bullard said a combination of his "annoying tendencies" to point out deficiencies in the paper as well as take politicians to task made him an easy target."

The crucial words here are, " "annoying tendencies" to point out deficiencies in the paper". Describes Kriel and his role at Sowetan to a tee.

Personally, I found the column last week by Bullard to be trite and just a bit juvenile, rehashing old angles and this grists the mill for those that believe he was on his way already and didn't care.

Conspiracy theorists are grouping as we speak.

Sems

Smells like a set-up to me....if it looks like a bunny, hops like a bunny, has ears like a bunny than it IS a bunny....he was the fall-guy. But I'm sure he's got his sights frimly set on other horizons....

I agree Noss

Definitely taking the fall for something.

He must

have pissed somebody off, big-time. Poor bugger. He'll probably write a book about his time at the Times and go on to make millions from it...

Noss

Making a good thing from a bad thing... :)

Btw, wish the hubby Happy Birthday.

Sems

I will, thanks. Haven't eaten all day....looking forward to something very fattening/bad for supper....see you SOON!!

Nos

For sure... just let me know where. I know when.

Sems

I'll call you in the morning, k?

Noss

Sweet like a lemon...